Arts & Opinion.com
  Arts Culture Analysis  
Vol. 21, No. 1, 2022
 
     
 
  Current Issue  
  Back Issues  
  About  
 
 
  Submissions  
  Subscribe  
  Comments  
  Letters  
  Contact  
  Jobs  
  Ads  
  Links  
 
 
  Editor
Robert J. Lewis
 
  Senior Editor
Bernard Dubé
 
  Contributing Editors
David Solway
Louis René Beres
Nick Catalano
Chris Barry
Don Dewey
Howard Richler
Gary Olson
Jordan Adler
Andrew Hlavacek
Daniel Charchuk
 
  Music Editor
Serge Gamache
 
  Arts Editor
Lydia Schrufer
 
  Graphics
Mady Bourdage
 
  Photographer Jerry Prindle
Chantal Levesque Denis Beaumont
 
  Webmaster
Emanuel Pordes
 
 
 
  Past Contributors
 
  Noam Chomsky
Mark Kingwell
Charles Tayler
Naomi Klein
Arundhati Roy
Evelyn Lau
Stephen Lewis
Robert Fisk
Margaret Somerville
Mona Eltahawy
Michael Moore
Julius Grey
Irshad Manji
Richard Rodriguez
Navi Pillay
Ernesto Zedillo
Pico Iyer
Edward Said
Jean Baudrillard
Bill Moyers
Barbara Ehrenreich
Leon Wieseltier
Nayan Chanda
Charles Lewis
John Lavery
Tariq Ali
Michael Albert
Rochelle Gurstein
Alex Waterhouse-Hayward
 
     

TEACHING GEORGE ELIOT'S SILAS MARNER


by
RON SINGER

____________________________________________________________

 

“What if the target of Thackeray’s criticism of Dickens’ maudlin sentimentality was Silas Marner? Instead of ‘whitewashed saints, like poor Biss Dadsy,’ it could have been, ‘Biss Eppie 'ull never be naughty again, else she must doe in da toal-hole--a back naughty pace.’"

“Well, that might, indeed, have been interesting. And never mind the fact that Ms. Evans and Mr. Lewes, themselves, had a – shall we say, vexed-- critical relationship with said Mr. Boz. And wasn’t it Virginia Woolf, Thackeray’s granddaughter, who famously opined that Dickens was suitable for children, but Eliot, for adults?”

“As in ‘Who’s Afraid of . . . ?’ ‘Biss Ginny, Biss Ginny, come back to the lighthouth!’ And her dad, Leslie Stephen, said Dickens was a great writer – for the half-educated.”

"The whole family seems to have had it in for poor Charles. Yet, as you both may be aware, it has recently been averred that Septimus is a Pip-double, and, more generally, that Mrs. Dalloway is an analogue of Great Expectations.”

“No shit, Shakespeare!” I (the narrator) say to that averment.

This learned colloquy (are there 'un-learned' ones?) took place over coffee, tea and pastries one Friday afternoon after school, in the English Department office of a New York City prep school. The participants, all currently teaching Silas Marner to tenth graders, were the Department’s two Young Turks, one male, one female, and an older male colleague (Pontificating Elder).

Can you assign the proper speech tags to the colloquy? The answers, in order, are YT (M), PE, YT (M), and YT (F). If the colloquy sounds like the trio were showing off, they were. Chalk it up to a long week of teaching and the prospect of a long weekend of essay grading.

Let us follow PE, whose real name is Lawrence Messer, as he dons his overcoat and leaves the building. By now, it is 6:15, and he is anticipating his dinner date with a lawyer named Margaret White. Mr. Messer – call me Larry, he might say to you or me, but certainly not to his students -- is looking forward to the date for several reasons.

Since Ms. White is not an English teacher, he will be spared further shoptalk (of which he has just had a bellyful). The other reasons include age (Margaret is in her forties, and he is fifty-three); temperament (she is sure of herself); and, finally, the nature of the relationship (companionable, possibly mildly romantic, each of them having been married once before).

But leaving PE to his pleasant anticipations (and convoluted syntax), we move to YT (F), whose name is Patricia Foley, or (to some sarcastic students) Fat Poley. Ms. Foley is aware of this nasty moniker, and once argued to her senior honours students, “Hey, guys, I don’t have a single Polish forebear. As for the ‘Fat’ bit, trust your eyes.” And she did a daring little pirouette that would have landed a male colleague in deep shit.

With that, Patty-Cake, as her main squeeze (a jazz musician, i.e. a Chet Baker’s man) called her (in private) had carried on with the class, a spirited debate as to whether Faulkner’s books, versus his life, made him a suitable target for the Cancel Culture.

Following the Friday afternoon tea ritual, Ms. Foley (YT, F) stayed behind in the Departmental office to get a jump on two classes’ worth of essays, a total of 28 (small classes, high tuition). She had promised to return them to both sections on Monday. Or, as she had put it (twice), “Since you’ve all been so brilliant this week, why shouldn’t I bust my ass for you while you’re out having fun?”

As she launched into the first essay, Ms. F. felt a bit guilty for having told a lie of omission: she had failed to mention the two gigs that would take up much of the weekend of her SO (Significant Other, for the older reader) – i.e., her Gilbert (whose style was avant-garde, or as Patty would sometimes quip, in one of her sourer moods, “avant-derriere.”)

As Ms. Foley was digging into (not tearing apart) her essays, YT (M), or Thomas (Tom, not Tommy) Mason, was heading west (without encountering young Lochinvar) toward the Avenue.

“Whence was YT (M) bound?” you ask.

He was “slouching toward” (not Bethlehem, but) a bar three or four blocks from school.
“Why so far?” you ask.

Not only was he too tired for further banter with any colleagues he might run into, he had recently heard, through the usual grapevine, that several students with fake I.D.’s were tempting fate (or something), by drinking at two places within a block-and-a-half of school. And Tom Mason definitely did not intend to waste his precious weekend liberty collaring students, and then going through all the rigmarole that would surely follow, as day follows night. (Tom might call this trite simile an OH, or Occupational Hazard.)

Plus, you never knew whom you might meet up with at one of the blarney bars he frequented. (Did he dare to eat a pastrami sandwich?) These places were among the haunts of New York City detectives, not to mention other cops, and fire-and garbage-men, plus assorted (some of them, sordid) blue-collar civilians. Tommy M. liked to pretend he was one of the boys.

“School’s out! Yay.” he exulted, skipping along the pavement, and flapping his arms against the cold.

“All clear!” cried a senior girl – young woman -- who spotted Tom crossing the Avenue. Party Time! And six students, ages fourteen to eighteen, all with fake I.D.’s, piled into the pub on the corner.

Returning to Larry Messer, the Pontificating Elder (PE), when he arrived at a cozy Italian restaurant ten blocks from the school (surely a safe distance), the host(ess) parked his overcoat in the check room, then showed him to his usual table, which he had booked earlier in the week. Consulting his phone, he saw that he was exactly on time – 7 p.m. —so it did not concern him that Margaret White had not yet arrived.

Offered a drink while he waited, he demurred, telling the server (male) that they would be ordering wine with dinner. After he had buttered and eaten a single breadstick (double-baked to a turn), he noted that Margaret was now seven minutes late.

“She must be clearing her desk before the weekend,” he told himself. But, then, he noticed that she had sent him a TM (Text Message, for the luddite reader). He assumed it would say she would be however many minutes late, for whatever (good) reason. But as he read, his complacency was quickly shredded:

L, (M. had typed, ominously – not 'Dear Larry,' her usual salutation), So sorry, but this afternoon, Dick Price, a colleague, asked if I happened to be free for dinner this evening. As I opened my mouth to tell him the bad news, I suddenly had a crazy impulse. “Why, yes, Dick, I do happen to be free. I thought you’d never ask.” After we had gone over the details, and he had departed for his office (with a spring in his step), I examined my impulse. The cause turned out to be simple: a strong feeling that my relationship with you had grown old. I mean, what are we? A forty-and a fifty-something, both widowed, both well-educated, liberal-minded professionals. And all of those dinner dates, plus all the concerts, plays and films (not movies). Larry, dear, I hope that you share my feeling, in other words, that the time has come for us to smooch and split. WE’VE BECOME BORRRING, MY DEAR, DON’T YOU THINK?

Sorry, and Love (still),
Margaret (never Marge,Meg, or etc.)

“Well,” Larry thought, “I guess that’s that!” (Or as his students might have put it, “What it is!”) He realized that he was already fending off disappointment, keeping 'it' in until later, when he would be safely back in his apartment. Calmly, too, he told the server that his dinner partner had cancelled the date because “something came up at the last minute.” (I’ll say!) Stoically, he directed the young man to remove the second place setting, and stoically (still), he ordered dinner for one (a simpler dinner than he and Margaret would have ordered). He even had the equanimity to add a demi-carafe of (an appropriate) wine, instead of the usual full bottle.

Dropping a curtain of consideration over Larry (PE) as he mouths his bitter breadsticks (of which, as Dante wrote about the bread of exile, “how salt the savor”), let us retreat to safe harbour with Pat Foley (YT-F), back at the English Department office.

By now, it is 7:45. Counting the two piles of essays on her desk, she realizes that the totals are, as she puts it, “Seven down, twenty-one to go.” The neatness of this fraction prompts further mental arithmetic, which reveals that, at present speed (surely optimistic), she will not finish before midnight.

Since this prospect is too grim for even the dutiful Ms. Foley, probably rendering her comatose on the morrow, for parts of which Gilbert will be free, she compromises, vowing to grade seven more essays now, and the rest, tomorrow evening, when Gil has his other gig.

With the sense of a burden lifted (temporarily), she downs tools, rises, stretches and crosses the office to the small fridge, where she has stowed a cheese sandwich and large salad, prepared and brought from home that morning, and half of a large coffee, prudently saved from the after-school gathering.

As she sips and munches, Pat Foley is suddenly swamped by regret over her dimming hopes of motherhood. At thirty-seven, the biological clock is ticking, and Gilbert has said, more than once, that his work, which includes composing as well as playing, is the only child he will ever need. “In old days,” Pat sorrowfully recalls, “angels . . . took men by the hand and led them away from the city of destruction . . . the hand may be a little child's.”

How similar are Ms. Foley’s feelings, as she partakes of her Spartan fare, to Larry Messer’s, as he awaits his Linguine Al Vongole and demi-carafe of Pinot Gris. Since stoicism has its limits, poor Larry has not ordered a salad. (If he had really not wanted the server to notice his disappointment, he should have ordered the salad). Unwilling to blame Margaret for her change of heart, he nurses his despair with a passage from Silas Marner: “There's nothing kills a man so soon as having nobody to find fault with but himself.”

Meanwhile, back at the . . . (yadda-yadda), Tom Mason notices for the umpteenth time how former Mayor Bloomberg’s campaign against smoking in bars and restaurants has put a damper (a dryer, really) on the ambience of the city’s drinking emporia (or emporiums).

Trying to spot one of his ersatz cronies, he finds none. When he bellies up to the bar and tries to join in the laughter at a (sexist) joke made by one member of a trio of strangers, a second member, a big, beefy, red-faced man wearing construction boots, heavy Carhartt khaki pants and jacket, and a decaled hard hat, gives poor Tom the stink eye, and says, “Do we know you, Mister?”

Slinking down the bar, Tom (YT, no more) catches the eye of the barista (female), and orders a pint of whatever. As he waits for her to draw his pint, Tom berates himself for the quixotic notion of trying to cross social-class lines, which he realizes was a kind of slumming, or reverse snobbery.

“If there is an angel,” he quotes to himself, in partial exoneration, “who records the sorrows of men as well as their sins, he knows how many and deep are the sorrows that spring from false ideas for which no man is culpable.”

 

YOUR COMMENTS
Email (optional)
Author or Title
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arts & Opinion, a bi-monthly, is archived in the Library and Archives Canada.
ISSN 1718-2034

 

Comedy Podcast with Jess Salomon and Eman El-Husseini
Bahamas Relief Fund
Film Ratings at Arts & Opinion - Montreal
Festival Nouveau Cinema de Montreal(514) 844-2172
Lynda Renée: Chroniques Québécois - Blog
Montreal Guitar Show July 2-4th (Sylvain Luc etc.). border=
Photo by David Lieber: davidliebersblog.blogspot.com
SPECIAL PROMOTION: ads@artsandopinion.com
SUPPORT THE ARTS
Valid HTML 4.01!
Privacy Statement Contact Info
Copyright 2002 Robert J. Lewis