Arts & Opinion.com
  Arts Culture Analysis  
Vol. 19, No. 3, 2020
 
     
 
  Current Issue  
  Back Issues  
  About  
 
 
  Submissions  
  Subscribe  
  Comments  
  Letters  
  Contact  
  Jobs  
  Ads  
  Links  
 
 
  Editor
Robert J. Lewis
 
  Senior Editor
Bernard Dubé
 
  Contributing Editors
David Solway
Louis René Beres
Nick Catalano
Chris Barry
Don Dewey
Howard Richler
Gary Olson
Jordan Adler
Andrew Hlavacek
Daniel Charchuk
 
  Music Editors
Serge Gamache
 
  Arts Editor
Lydia Schrufer
 
  Graphics
Mady Bourdage
 
  Photographer
Jerry Prindle
Chantal Levesque Denis Beaumont
 
  Webmaster
Emanuel Pordes
 
 
 
  Past Contributors
 
  Noam Chomsky
Mark Kingwell
Naomi Klein
Arundhati Roy
Evelyn Lau
Stephen Lewis
Robert Fisk
Margaret Somerville
Mona Eltahawy
Michael Moore
Julius Grey
Irshad Manji
Richard Rodriguez
Navi Pillay
Ernesto Zedillo
Pico Iyer
Edward Said
Jean Baudrillard
Bill Moyers
Barbara Ehrenreich
Leon Wieseltier
Nayan Chanda
Charles Lewis
John Lavery
Tariq Ali
Michael Albert
Rochelle Gurstein
Alex Waterhouse-Hayward
 
     

a window on a derelict culture
HOUSE HUNTERS

by
DAVID SOLWAY

______________________________

David Solway is a Canadian poet and essayist (Random Walks) and author of The Big Lie: On Terror, Antisemitism, and Identity and Hear, O Israel! (Mantua Books). His editorials appear regularly in PJ Media. His monograph, Global Warning: The Trials of an Unsettled Science (Freedom Press Canada) was launched at the National Archives in Ottawa in September, 2012.His latest book is Notes from a Derelict Culture. A CD of his original songs, Partial to Cain, appeared in 2019.


Like many people, I’ve been watching House Hunters and its cousin House Hunters International on HGTV with considerable interest, though perhaps not for the usual reasons. I understand the charm the program has for its viewers: the pleasure of visiting houses and their locales, the ideas one may get for redecorating one’s own dwelling, the information about places one may wish to visit or move to, the guessing game regarding which of the inevitable three houses the purchasers will settle for, or simply abundant material for one’s fantasy life.

But I do wonder how many viewers realize that the whole business is largely a scripted hallucination which may even be hazardous to one’s future decisions if taken seriously. And as we will see in the ensuing, it partakes as well of a progressivist rage for leftist queer and gender politics.

To begin with, House Hunters et al. paint a scrubbed and prettified picture of the subject. I recall several episodes dealing with the lovely Greek island of Paros, featuring gorgeous, well-appointed villas replete with lavish amenities including ample showers and impressive fireplaces. I lived in Greece for several years and know the island well -- well enough to know that, like most Aegean islands, it suffers from critical water shortages and an equally critical lack of firewood owing to centuries of forest denudation. Showers will be few and winters will be rheumatoid. And unwary buyers will be sucking lemons.

This is only one instance of the HGTV lie. Cabo San Lucas is another popular HGTV fable, focusing on gleaming condominiums and stunning views. The hagglers, cheats, swarms of importunate vendors, heavy traffic, sewage treatment problems and evidence of extortionate prices are left on the cutting-room floor. Caveat emptor.

Moreover, dialogue and character must rank the program at the lowest end of the entertainment industry scale. The dialogue is cloyingly banal with its ceaseless empty chatter, and the prospective buyers/renovators are generally among the most vapid and unattractive cast of characters one could ever hope to avoid.

These are people whose major interest in life seems to consist of countertops, backsplashes and double vanities; whose speech garbles with wow, awesome, omigod, beachy feel, open concept, price point, lots of natural light, I love it, I’m not a big fan of, we like to entertain, it’s a little tight, I like to grill, and so on, a shrunken lexicon tirelessly repeated.

Participants are obviously coached to behave like puppets, but one wonders what self-respecting person would agree to so demeaning a charade. And practically every one of these people apparently possesses a degree of personal taste one would associate with a connoisseur of the fine arts. Couples are expert in architectural distinctions, whether Ranch, Craftsman, Colonial, Cape Cod, Cottage, Farmhouse, Contemporary, Georgian, Art Deco or what have you. This, too, is part of the HGTV lie.

HGTV may once have appealed to family viewing but that is rapidly changing. The participants remain no less fatuous and predictable but now they are gradually becoming same-sex couples as the producers try to “get with” the progressivist trends of the day. These couples are no more intellectually interesting than their normative predecessors and, indeed, are often given to a frisson of theatrical posturing, which seems to go with the territory.
But HGTV has clearly decided to break even newer ground, featuring its first throuple searching for a home in Colorado Springs. The word “throuple” is hammered in to practically every conversational passage as the woke threesome prances around considering furniture and appliances.

There arises the significant issue of a triple vanity, a triple bed or a three car garage. We are treated to a joking reference to a three-way fireplace, accompanied by scads of phony laughter.

The nuclear couple have two children who will, apparently, happily adapt to the current orthodoxy of deviance. One shudders to think what lies in store for them. Ben Shapiro has made the argument regarding the welfare of the children, which here amounts to the sacrifice of the innocents or, in his words, “No one gives a crap about the kids.” I see all kinds of trouble -- or is it throuble -- ahead and would not be surprised if the two women -- the wife is bisexual -- hive off into a relationship of their own while the beta husband is left footing the alimony bill. O brave new world that has such people in it, to quote Shakespeare’s ingenuous Miranda.

Of course, HGTV has plenty of company, as we would expect. Sherlock Holmes and John Watson may be a squeeze. Batwoman is a lesbian. The film Spider-Man: Far From Home includes an openly transgender actor and a new film will reportedly show Spidey with a boyfriend. According to actor Haaz Sleiman, the new Marvel movie The Eternals will highlight “a beautiful, very moving kiss” between two men. All the diversity and inclusion one could wish for!

Our social world is obviously becoming increasingly grody with same-sex, transgender, polyamorous and sologamous infatuations -- sologamy, or self-marriage, is now an “item.” The normalization of polyamory, as Princeton University legal scholar Robert P. George remarks, is less a “slippery slope” than the “unfolding of the logic of social liberalism.”

As of February 2015, HGTV reached 96,620,000 American households, near the top of the cable food chain, not counting its foreign broadcast range. The number has surely grown. And this is why I watch HGTV, when I can stomach it. It provides a bay window on the culture as it seeks to normalize what is abnormal and destructive to the traditional way of life, loosening the glueterium that keeps a culture whole and intact. In its own way, HGTV is a kind of fake news, what James Bridle in New Dark Age calls the “democritisation of propaganda . . . an amplifier of the division that already exists in society.”

The triviality and disingenuousness which are its stock-in-trade are bad enough as a sign of cultural decay, but do not necessarily portend social collapse. It is, rather, the incursion into the bizarro realm of contra naturam, of all that is freakish and grotesque in the surrealistic world we are preparing for our children, that is plainly visible in what was once a silly but family-oriented production. The corrosive logic of “social liberalism,” that is, of postmodern relativism and gender anarchy, is on full display, forcing viewers into a new frontier of social engineering and presenting a family tragedy-in-the-making as a piece of benign frivolity and revisionary adventure. Indeed, we are witnessing a form of what poststructuralist French theorist Michael Foucault called biopolitics, explained in his collected lectures The Birth of Biopolitics as “a new body, a multiple body, a body with so many heads that . . . cannot necessarily be counted.”

Will the home survive the moral wreckage of the time? Will the average viewer eventually twig to what is going on? After all, a majority seem fine with the prefab drivel that engulfs them, so perhaps the response to the radical upheaval on offer will be one of assent, however grudging.

YOUR COMMENTS
 
Email Address
(not required)

 

By David Solway:
The Tattoo: Sign of the Times
Where Have All the Alphas Gone?
They Burn Witches, Don't They?
Aboriginal Claims of Sovereignty
Toxic Feminism

The Scourge of Multiculturalism
Power of the Phrase: Hidden Persuaders
Is Islamic Reform Possible?
Living on the Diagonal
The Birds and the Bees
Free Speech Vs. Hate Speech
The Shaping of Our Destiny
The Scandal of Human Rights
Reconsidering the Feminine Franchise
A Melancholy Calculation
Canada: A Tragically Hip Nation
The Ideal of Perfection in Faith and Politics
The Mystery of Melody
The Necessity of Trump
Dining out with Terrorists
What About Our Sons
Identity Games
The Hour Is Later Than We Think
Caveat Internettor
Why I Like Country Music
We Have Met the Enemy
The Obama Bomb
Don't Apologize Dude
Winners and Losers
Why I Write
Praying by the Rules
Age of Contradiction
Snob Factor Among Conservatives
Islam's Infidels
David Suzuki Down
Infirmative Action
The Education Mess We're In
The Intelligence Potential Factor
Gnostics of Our Time
Decline of Literate Thought
Galloping Agraphia
Socialist Transfer of Wealth
Deconstructing the State
Delectable Lie (Multiculturalism)
The Weakness of the West
When a Civilization Goes Mad
Deconstructing Chomsky
The Multiculti Tango
Utopiah: Good Place or No Place
Palin for President?
The Madness of Reactive Politics
Liberty or Tyranny
Shunning Our Friends
A Culture of Losers
Political Correctness and the Sunset of American Power
Talking Back to Talkbackers
Letting Iran Go Nuclear
Robespierre & Co.
The Reign of Mediacracy
Into the Heart of the United Nations
The Big Lie
As You Like It
Confronting Islam
Unveiling the Terrorist Mind

 

 

YOUR COMMENTS
Email (optional)
Author or Title

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arts & Opinion, a bi-monthly, is archived in the Library and Archives Canada.
ISSN 1718-2034

 

Bahamas Relief Fund
Film Ratings at Arts & Opinion - Montreal
2016 Festival Nouveau Cinema de Montreal, Oct. 05-16st, (514) 844-2172
Lynda Renée: Chroniques Québécois - Blog
Montreal Guitar Show July 2-4th (Sylvain Luc etc.). border=
Photo by David Lieber: davidliebersblog.blogspot.com
SPECIAL PROMOTION: ads@artsandopinion.com
SUPPORT THE ARTS
Valid HTML 4.01!
Privacy Statement Contact Info
Copyright 2002 Robert J. Lewis