code is replacing the act of creation
OUT OF DARKNESS
reviewed by
ANTHONY MERINO
______________________________________
Anthony
Merino, renowned independent art critic, has published over
70 reviews. He is a ceramic
artist and has lectured internationally on contemporary
ceramics.
The
new head curator of Denmark’s ARoS Aarhus Kunstmuseum
of Art, Erlend G. Høyersten introduced his artistic vision
with the exhibition Out of the Darkness. Discussing
the exhibition, he cites actions, film, and the Bible as influences
on the final exhibition. Navigating in the dark through the
exhibition’s maze of black walls and curtains, Universal
Studio’s The Wizarding World of Harry Potter ™
seems like a far more salient influence. Both are essentially
fully immersive experiences. While this has been one of the
defining characteristics
of amusement parks -- it is a radical reinvention of the museum.
In light of Kuspit’s comments, it may be a necessary reinvention.
In fact, if art is becoming nothing more than code: Out
of the Darkness can be viewed as Høyersten raising
the ramparts and defending the last vestige of the image as
a primary experience.
In
stating “the image becomes a secondary manifestation --
a material epiphenomenon” Kuspit’s description of
the mechanics of digitalization actually has two practical ramifications
in our society: conversion of image to code and objects into
commodities. Kuspit does not touch on commodification. What
digitization does in the physical realm commodification does
in the conceptual realm. The mechanics are the same for both.
Essentially, digitalization involves the breaking down of any
image into a series of dots or dashes. Commodification renders
everything down to a quantitative value. Both effectively erradicate
the sacredness of the object. In the analog word there is a
huge, quantitative difference between Leonardo da Vinci’s
Mona Lisa and a painting of Elvis on black velvet.
In the digital realm, there is no difference -- both are dots
and dashes, just arranged differently. The same is true for
commodification. In a true pure capitalist environment -- the
difference between a da Vinci and Elvis on black velvet is quantitative;
their price. In the most extreme case, some economists argue
that human life can be measured exclusively by its future earning
potential.
Høyersten
acknowledges this near the end of the exhibition where he set
up a black room where the walls are lined with light weight
industrial shelving. A wide array of eclectic objects, from
a few Warhol prints and organs preserved in a glass jar, to
a video of two performance artists grating onions, fill the
shelves. The final result feels a bit like a salon crossed with
a yard sale. This creates an effect that every object in the
room had outlived its cultural relevance. The inclusion of the
Warhol prints generates an air of irony to the room. The most
famous quote attributed to Warhol was, “In the future,
everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes.”
This
dark room reads as kind of an echo of the traditional museum
experience, while the rest of the exhibition is created almost
completely around immersive environments. Even rooms that just
contained objects seemed so dark and small that the viewer felt
more like they were interacting with rather than viewing the
art. One room includes Italian artist Maurizio Nannucci’s
My Sense of Your Sense of Language, the text is compressed
and written using white neon lights. By narrowing both the letters
and spacing between the letters, the effect is like we are looking
at the text from an acute angle even when the viewer is looking
at it straight on. In addition, the sign takes up almost the
entire display wall. Since the room is so small, the viewer
can never get back far enough to take in the entire work. In
this instance, the installation echoes content of the work.
Nannucci illustrates that at its most fundamental, language
is subjective. Every word, period or space is socially determined
and therefore has content. This is exaggerated by how the work
is installed. Being in a small space the viewer can never be
able to move back far enough to read the entire work. Hence
-- not only is language subjective in what is said, it is subjective
in what is heard.
Out
of the Darkness includes a large installation, Five
Angels for the Millennium, 2001, in which Bill Viola surrounds
the viewer with both sounds and images. Each video contains
and image of a pool of water. Each image is done in a single
high intensity hue including turquoise, aqua and cyan. A clothed
male figure either dives into or emerges from each video at
irregular intervals. The mix of water sounds becomes almost
hypnotic. By engulfing the viewer in sound -- Viola makes the
viewer feel as if they are also the subject as much as they
are the viewer of the images.
The
most radical piece in the exhibition is Olafur Eliasson’s
Your Atmospheric Colour Atlas, 2009. The piece is a
fully enclosed room filled with haze and florescent lights.
Inside, the viewer walks through a fog of vibrant colors and
is unable to see more than a few feet ahead. The experience
is quite disconcerting. Looking down, the floor is completely
obscure. This creates a feeling of walking on air. In addition,
the experience is extremely claustrophobic.
Kuspit
concluded his essay with the observation that images now ”exist[s]
only to make the invisible code visible.” This is really
a radical change in how we view art. Part of function of visual
art has been to make the intangible tangible. Erlend G. Høyersten’s
Out of the Darkness asserts this as the function of
art. Unfortunately, by relying so heavily on engulfing the viewer
in the art, it seems to accept the tenants of the argument it
undermines.
By
Anthony Merino:
Updating
Walter Benjamin
Ego
and Art
Nick
Cave & Funk(adelic)
Foucault
for Dummies