|
the return of the late
BRUCE CHATWIN
by
JOHN M. EDWARDS
_____________________________________
John M. Edwards middlenamed his daughter after his favourite
travel writer, Bruce Chatwin. His work has appeared in Amazon.com,
CNN Traveller, Missouri Review, Salon.com, Grand Tour, Michigan
Quarterly Review, Escape, Global Travel Review, Condé
Nast Traveler, International Living, Emerging Markets and
Entertainment Weekly. He helped write “Plush”
(the opening chords), voted The Best Song of the 20th Century
by Rolling Stone Magazine.
For
the late great Bruce Chatwin (1940-89) life was a journey to
be taken on two legs. Obsessed with nomads, he periodically
became one himself, ditching two successful careers, as Sotheby’s
art expert and Sunday Times columnist, to roam the
exotic edges of the literary wilderness.
Whether
it was stumbling across the Sudanese desert with Kipling’s
migratory tribes of Fuzzy-Wuzzies, following in the footsteps
of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid across the Patagonian
pampas, or tracing mythic Aboriginal songlines in the Australian
outback, the enigmatic wanderer was always in search of the
marvelous, extraordinary, and unexpected, even if he didn’t
exactly rough it. (His silk jammies were usually within snatching
distance).
So
what if he was also notorious for bending the truth a little?
Chatwin’s
alchemical fusion of fact and fiction is brought to the fore,
for example, in Susannah Clapp’s entertaining biography,
With Chatwin: Portrait of a Writer. Chatwin’s
former editor paints a vivid portrait of the multifaceted, irrepressible,
dervish-like walker and talker she knew. Clapp says, “Chatwin
liked clear outlines, plain surfaces and unexpected bursts of
color.” He also was intrigued by “paradox and inconsistency.”
Though the book is clear on what Chatwin liked, it leaves what
he was like somewhat uncertain. There is a disputed border between
biography and biographer, since Clapp’s blue pencil pared
down the lapidary Impressionistic prose -- with its honed Hemingwayesque
phrases and profound Proustian details -- that made Chatwin’s
literary reputation.
Examining
the editing process itself, Clapp explains how they reduced
the once-massive manuscript of In Patagonia, a classic
that paradoxically broadened the field of travel writing, down
into a slim volume of cubist pen-portraits. Dangling between
fact and fiction, mixing myth, history, reportage and autobiography,
Bruce pops up all over Patagonia, but dispenses with important
(boring to Chatwin) links like how he got from A to B or his
secret thoughts while on the road, as his friend and energetic
rival Paul Theroux frequently complained. Intricately linked
to Chatwin personally and professionally, Clapp is well suited
to connect the dots while separating the man from the books,
the art from the life, the legend from the reality.
By
eyeballing his oeuvre, we can further deconstruct some of the
myths surrounding a man who eventually became famous for being
famous. As Michael Ignatieff famously quipped, Chatwin’s
own character “was one of his greatest inventions.”
In
fact, while I attended Tulane University in New Orleans, I got
to know Bruce a little when the much-older-than-we pretend student
crashed an anthropology class I was taking, with a prof sporting
an antique square mustache similar to the one worn by Charlie
Chaplain as The Little Tramp or an infamous totalitarian
dictator. I also was there the night Bruce famously danced with
a live python around his neck. I remember saying to him, “Bruce,
what are you doing? That snake might be poisonous.” With
pretend fear, he backed slowly out of the bar, and went onward.
Before
departing Planet Earth in 1989 (at age 48) of what he claimed
was a “rare bone disease” caused by Chinese eggs
(close sources say it really was AIDS), Chatwin had become a
living literary cult figure, comparable with such figures as
Oscar Wilde, Robert Louis Stevenson, and T. E. Lawrence. Still,
Chatwin known to his friends as ‘Chatterbox,’ was
“feted for his looks as well as his books” -- indeed,
he was celebrated for his extraordinary physical beauty as well
as his gifts as a conversationalist and writer. With his Midas
locks, patrician profile and extraterrestrial blue eyes, he
would, according to Howard Hodgkin, “flirt with man, woman,
or dog.”
One
acquaintance said memorably that he had the “mad mad eyes
of a nineteenth-century explorer,” others, the “glittering
eyes of the Ancient Mariner.” Since I’m sure I met
him years ago in New Orleans, without knowing exactly who he
was (some blond guy named Bruce with a live python around his
neck), I would imagine that he paid close attention to his appearance,
constantly grooming himself and checking his reflection. On
the trail, in Afghanistan, Wales, or India, he could be found
in his signature khaki shorts (“Bruce’s little shorts,”
joked his good-time-charlie friends) -- which I imagine he might
have modeled after Tintin -- with ankle-length walking boots
and neatly turned-down fawn socks, delighting observers with
its whiff of the Raj.
Salman
Rushdie said the Chatwin in the books was not “the whole
person he was when you met him.” Aesthete, archaeologist,
art expert, journalist, gourmand, photographer, writer, the
polymath Chatwin even as a child seemed to have “a sense
of his own importance,” according to Clapp. Maybe, a kind
of ESP of the Bruces he’d later be.
Born
on May 13, 1940, in Sheffield, England, Chatwin’s early
years were marked by movement. “I lived in NAAFI canteens
and was passed around like a tea urn,” he remarked on
his semi-nomadic childhood. Even at Marlborough ‘college’
(transatlantic translation: high school), Bruce was unlike other
students. Nicknamed “Lord Chatwin,” he was “an
Edith Sitwell reader among a lot of Nevil Shute fans,”
began collecting expensive antique furniture, and was singled
out for his abilities as an actor, as well as his insouciance.
One teacher wrote of him, “His gift may be slender perhaps,
but it is genuine.” But not genuine enough to get him
into Oxford or Cambridge. It wasn’t until Bruce began
working at Sotheby’s that he came into his own.
Much
is made about Chatwin having The Eye, the quasi-mystical ability
to recognize at a glance an original or a fake. For example,
as a teen star at Sotheby’s “the blond boy”
correctly identified a Picasso harlequin as a forgery. Similarly,
when he began his writing career at the late age of 37, he could
distinguish between a fine or foul sentence. Or between interesting
and boring. “Bruce made people look at things differently
and made them look at different things,” Clapp quips.
In
one of my favorite miniatures from What Am I Doing Here
(which famously doesn’t explain what he was doing there,
nor does it evidence good punctuation, since the question mark
in the title is inexplicably missing), Chatwin describes a memorable
(but iffy) Art World meeting with The Bey:
One morning there appeared an elderly and anachronistic gentleman
in a black Astrakhan-collared coat, carrying a black silver-tipped
cane. His syrupy eyes and brushed-up moustache announced him
as a relic of the Ottoman Empire.
“Can you show me something beautiful?” he asked.
“Greek, not Roman!”
“I think I can, “ I said.
I showed him a fragment of an Attic white-ground lekythos by
the Achilles Painter which had the most refined drawing, in
golden-sepia, of a naked boy. It had come from the collection
of Lord Elgin.
“Ha!” said the gentleman. “I see you have
The Eye. I too have The Eye. We shall be friends.”
He handed me his card. I watched the black coat recede into
the gallery:
Paul A_____ F_____ Bey
Grand Chamberlain du Cour du Roi des Albanis
Fact
or fiction? Fact. Bruce really did own Hawaiian King Kamehameha’s
bed sheet. Fiction? Was Bruce really approached, as he claimed,
by British Intelligence while traveling in communist Eastern
Europe? Fact. Bruce sort of smuggled a Cezanne out of France.
Fiction? He tricked Customs inspectors by posing as the picture’s
painter. Fact. Bruce really was caught in a coup in Benin, while
researching The Viceroy of Ouidah. Fiction? What happened to
him in the story “The Coup” (atrocities are spoken
of in the accents of Noel Coward) is apocryphal.
Stories
simply changed as they were recalled, becoming in translation
akin to tales both tall and twice-told. He often talked -- sometimes
as if it were fantasy, sometimes fact -- of a day spent at Carnival
in Rio, making love first to a girl, then to a boy. To Chatwin,
the word story was meant to “alert the reader to the fact
that, however closely the narrative may fit the facts, the fictional
process has been at work.” This was taken to the extreme
in The Songlines, when Chatwin appears as a fictional
character named ‘Bruce’ knocking about the dreaming
tracks of the Aussie outback with a guy called Arkady (who might
have really been Salman Rushdie).
Over
the causes of wanderlust, Chatwin puzzled. In much of his work,
he attempts to explain why men wander rather than sit still.
(Even his surname, derived from the Anglo-Saxon chette-wynde,
meaning winding path, fortuitously prefigures his major obsession).
He agreed with Pascal that man’s unhappiness stems from
a single cause: “his inability to remain quietly in a
room.”
Hence,
in Bruce’s anti-travel novel On the Black Hill,
two identical octogenarian twins never leave their house of
birth in the Welsh countryside. In The Viceroy of Ouidah,
a crammed and claustrophobic book, the main character, a Brazilian
slave trader from Dahomey, considers “any set of four
walls to be a tomb or a trap,” yet is involved with confining
others. Conversely, The Songlines is airy and open,
examining mankind’s migratory drive to walk long distances.
Chatwin, like Baudelaire, had a “horreur du domicile,”
and was often away from his immaculately planned London pied
à terre (“a cross between a cell and a ship’s
cabin”), constantly looking for the ideal space in which
to write, seemingly always elusively elsewhere.
The
opposite of the nomad is the collector, and Chatwin even talked
about his travels as collecting places. In his later years,
Chatwin, once an expert on the Impressionists and an avid art
collector himself, developed an almost Bedouin sensibility.
Sharing the nomad’s horror of the graven image, he believed,
“Man should own no possessions but those he can conveniently
carry.”
Which
strikes home to me, since I laboured under a heavy backpack
for one entire year in the Antipodes (Australia, New Zealand,
and the South Pacific) and two full years in Europe. Where,
believe it or not, I bumped into Bruce again -- many years after
our drunken binges at the New Orleans watering holes of The
Boot and Tin Lizzies -- at a mountain hut along New Zealand’s
dire Routebourne Track, where he drank most of my whiskey and
said, “Be sure to write it all down: beyond your wildest
dreams.” He cast a spell that seemingly echoed down through
the years.
And
when I returned to United States, my dad showed me his copy
of the then recently released The Songlines, with a
photo of Bruce on the back, resembling Ilya Kuriakan from “The
Man From Uncle.” I then decided, like Barton Fink, to
also become “A Writah.”
When
Chatwin finally got around to throwing out most of his own possessions,
only his close friends knew what he was getting at in so many
words: Smash the idols. While collecting art and freely giving
it away, Chatwin developed very pronounced theories about the
cult of fetishism and the decadence of possession -- a subject
he would explore in essays like “The Morality of Things”
and return to in his last book, Utz, about an obsessive-compulsive
collector of Meissen porcelain in Prague. In one passage the
nameless narrator (Bruce?) tells Utz of a man he met who was
a dealer in dwarfs:
“And what
did they do with those dwarfs?” Utz tapped me on the knee.
He had paled with excitement and was mopping the sweat from
his brow.
“Kept them,” I said. “The sheik, if I remember
right, liked to sit his favorite dwarf on his forearm and his
favorite falcon on the dwarf’s forearm.”
“Nothing else?”
“How can one know?”
“You are right,” said Utz. “There are things
one cannot know.”
One
thing nobody can know for sure is what Chatwin, with his museum-like
mind and ultra-ambiguous persona, was really like below the
surface. It was one of his charms, Clapp claims, to be “several
apparently contradictory things and to reconcile them in his
books.” A literary chameleon, Chatwin, who’d purportedly
“never heard of the Muppets,” was famous for his
evasiveness. (“I don’t believe in coming clean,”
he once said -- no: creeched -- to Paul Theroux.) Yes indeed,
he was full of contradictions: he was a lover of the austere
who had a flamboyant manner; he was gay, yet happily married;
he worked in the art world, but railed against objects and possessions;
he proposed the Nomadic Alternative for mankind (his
unfinished magnum opus), while staying and writing abroad comfortably
ensconced in the homes of famous friends. (“For a nomad,”
commented one host after an extended Bruce visit, “he
spends an awful lot of time in one place.”) Even his most
commercially successful book, The Songlines, is an
anomaly -- its publishers classified it nonfiction in Britain
but fiction in America.
Yet
after reading every single last one of his essays in the posthumously
released Anatomy of Restlessness, I decided that Bruce, so difficult
to pin down and pigeonhole, simply wanted to be a writer, on
the strength of one line: “I thought that telling stories
was the only conceivable occupation for a superfluous person
such as myself.”
Going
back to Clapp, rather than to Nicholas Shakespeare and his amazing
definitive biography (which you will have to judge for yourself),
she quite elegantly suggests in a roundabout way that Bruce
might have wanted to be an actor on the world stage. She calls
him “a skillful manager of remarkable entrances and surprise
appearances,” and one does wonder if Chatwin did in fact
live life as if he were in a very weird version of The Truman
Show -- waiting the mixed reviews of his audience.
His
absences were as dramatic as his presences. After a hysterical
bout of blindness (entirely psychosomatic), he exited Sotheby’s
by setting off for the Sudan, under doctor’s orders to
gaze at long horizons; the symptoms mysteriously disappeared
at the airport. His restless nature outed again when the wily
wanderer resigned from the Sunday Times with a theatrical
telegram, simply saying, “Gone to Patagonia.”
Toward
the end of his life, intermittently feverish and high on painkillers,
Bruce reappeared in public as “hyper-Bruce, an exaggerated,
speeded-up version of his already emphatic self.” Basically,
he would just show up like an unexpected surprise party favour
at shindigs, lavishly entertain guests at the Ritz, or wheelchair
around on manic buying-and-selling expeditions, announcing to
store owners, “I’m going to be one of your best
customers” -- while his wife, Elizabeth, and a loyal cadre
of friends and fans busily canceled his checks and returned
objects to dealers. Even during his grim finale, groomed in
bed “like an old baboon” by his wife (and nurse),
he did what he did best: Chatwin chatted.
In
one final Chatwinesque twist, life imitated art. Chatwin’s
commemoration service was a baffling, even camp, Greek Orthodox
ceremony, complete with black-robed and bearded priests swinging
censers and chanting Bruce (his last joke, according to friend
Martin Amis). Which occurred the same day as the Ayatollah’s
fatwa on Salman Rushdie, who appeared to pay his respects before
being whisked away into hiding. Clapp, whose own prose style
at times weirdly mirrors Chatwin’s sparse, exotic signatory
script) says it was as if Bruce had “manipulated”
the scene from beyond the grave.
Though
Chatwin “hardly wrote a confessional line in his life”
(he never publicized his homosexuality, or, better, bisexuality,
for example), only time will tell what other surprises await
inside his eighty-five private moleskin notebooks, scheduled
to be released to the public sometime around 2013/2014. But
meanwhile we have Chatwin’s published work to puzzle over,
urging even the most sedentary armchair readers into the unknown
and awakening the nomad in all of us.
And
I’m not joking when I say that I believe Chatwin is still
alive somewhere. Or, as I’m wont to aphorize: “Some
of us will live forever. . . .” In a vainglorious attempt
to retrace Chatwin’s past and path, I made a special request
to stay a few nights in his atmospheric room at the Ritz Hotel
in “Londinium,” which was homely enough, like a
flowery combo of your batty aunt’s and Van Gogh’s
bedroom. Dealing with the staff, I felt like a defensive cultish
member of The Psychic Friends Network: “No, I’m
not John Edward, the televangelist psychic; I’m John Edwards
(with an ‘s’), the traveling journalist.”
Bruce
Chatwin’s fairly recent collection of letters called Under
the Sun is a window into the real guy behind the myth. With
so many secrets to keep, Bruce would deem this collection of
his solitary epistles as an outright invasion of his privacy,
which is reason enough to chuck it into your Amazon cart and
then chart a course for high adventure.
also by John M. Edwards:
Coffe
Art of Sol Bolaños
|
|
|