There’s no precedent for it in the animal world: Homo
sapiens is the only species on the planet that sexually
preys upon members of the same species who are not sexually
mature. From the Latin paedo, signifying child,
and phile, meaning love, we get paedophile or pedophile
(American spelling). Ninety six percent of pedophiles are
male.
Since Homo sapiens
is the only life form that includes pedophiles among its
numbers, and is sentient (self-conscious), we must conclude
that among certain members of the species there a very particular
linkage between being self-conscious and the impulse to
engage in sex with unselfconscious forms of life, such as
children and animals.
Of the human
condition and its constants, there is perhaps none as unnerving
as having to deal with self-consciousness, which is why
all cultures, without exception, encourage the regular ingestion
of substances that numb or partially disable the neocortical
functions of the brain. Freud went so far to suggest that
all humans harbour a secret death wish, or longing to return
to the inanimate (unselfconscious being). Being self-aware
before the gaze of the other is a source of angst for which
there is no cure other than sleep or escaping the public
domain, which is why we comport ourselves one way in public
and another in private.
When it comes
to smoothing out the rough edges of self-consciousness,
most men make do with a spliff or a couple of doubles at
the end of the day, but for others (the hermit, the monk),
a life of solitude is the only practical response to the
anxiety produced by any kind of social contact – a
withdrawal doubtlessly blessed by every mother of a small
child. The ascetic life, however, is a high-minded, discipline-heavy
state of affairs that will not appeal to the majority of
sexually disabled pedophiles for whom sexual gratification
is a recurring appetite that must be satisfied at all costs.
These types quite naturally gravitate to environments where
they will be free from the apprehension and paralysis produced
by self-consciousness.
THE BLAME GAME
Brain scans
now confirm that homosexuality isn’t learned but is
innate. And now pedophiles, between kiddie stalking and
plea bargaining sessions, are looking to hitch a ride on
the “I was born that way” bandwagon. Appealing
to science without any consideration of moral correctness,
they would have us believe that their predatory predilections
are as DNA-ordained as hetero- or homosexuality.
Studies indicate
that pedophiles are disproportionately left-handed, have
lower IQs by 10 points and are an inch shorter than normal.
And while outcomes vary considerably from one study to the
next, a significant percentage of sexually abused children
become sexually abusive adults. We also know that there
is a cause and effect relationship between pedophilia and
the pathological displacement of erotic excitement (fetish),
where sexual imprinting is linked to an object or exceptional
event. An adolescent who experiences his first ejaculation
in and around a slipper may become dependent on the slipper
for his sexual pleasure, and if he experiences the same
playing with a small boy (a younger brother, a cousin) he
risks becoming dependent on the presence of a child for
sexual gratification. But all of these facts and arguments
in their aggregate do not explain or predict the prevalence
of pedophilia.
Irrespective
of pedophilia's complex and multi-faceted etiology, what
all pedophiles have in common is their sexual attraction
to persons (children) who do not possess critical faculties
of judgment. Closely related to pedophilia is bestiality
(animal sex), preying on the mentally challenged, or women
who have been rendered unconscious by drugs (date rape)
and/or alcohol, and necrophilia (sex with the deceased)
– sexual environments where men do not have to fear
being judged on their sexual performance.
Unlike women,
men have to perform sexually when they engage in sex; they
are judged and just as importantly judge themselves on their
performance, and a small percentage of men, for whatever
reasons (physiological, psychological) who are not up to
scratch, who are sexually disabled, are only able to perform
sexually in the presence of or in conjunction with persons
(children) lacking critical faculties of judgment. It should
be noted that mature men are not attracted to children like
they are attracted to a Playboy centerfold: they
are attracted to the judgment-free zone that only children
can provide. These people are not born pedophile; their
perversion is not innate. Pedophilia is the last resort
of the sexually disabled.
Not all sexually
disabled men are pedophiles. The majority, for whom conscience
and morality still count for something -- in this, the Age
of Decadence -- choose to address their sexual needs through
more acceptable outlets: from abstinence to masturbation
and even bestiality. The latter, however disconcerting and
theologically problematic, is by far and away more acceptable
than pedophilia since the presumably orifice capable beast
is neither harmed by the visit nor is consent an issue.
There is a moral case to be made that -- one to which most
mothers of small children would surely subscribe -- what
happens in the OK Corral after midnight is more than OK
if it results in one less pedophiled 5-year-old.
Some pedophiles,
with the exceptional ability to confuse fantasy for reality,
are able to perform if their consenting partner is dressed
up like a child or doll. That they are stigmatized and ridiculed
for their left of center proclivities (ersatz pedophilia)
is unfortunate since they are harmlessly displacing desires
that might otherwise require the presence of an innocent
child.
Related to pedophilia
and the sexually disabled man is the staggering suicide
differential between men and women. In Canada, according
to 2001 figures, men are almost four times more likely than
women to commit suicide. In all walks of life men have to
perform in a variety of competitive circumstances, and that
includes the sexual arena where there is no circumventing
the judgment (self-consciousness) that attaches itself to
sexual performance. However tough is a woman’s lot,
especially for the luckless at the bottom end of the looks
scale and those systematically beaten down by misogynist
culture, the disproportionate male to female suicide ratio
forces the conclusion that it is existentially much more
difficult self-actualizing as a man than a woman.
One of the unintended
effects of women’s liberation movements, the speed
of which has taken many men by unpleasant surprise, is that
more and more men are becoming sexually disabled. It is
surely not a coincidence that since the 1960s, the beginning
of the sexual revolution, the teenage suicide rate has spiked
along with ‘reported’ incidences of pedophilia.
With the advent
of the Internet and computer simulated life (VR=virtual
reality), there is considerable anecdotal evidence that
youngsters who are regularly exposed to on-line pornography
develop unrealistic expectations as it concerns performance.
It wasn’t so long ago an adolescent’s first
exposure to sex was via the brassiere section of a Sears
catalog or Gauguin’s nudes. Nowadays, just after being
tucked into bed by his mother, 8-year-old, iConnected Billie
turns on his cell phone, clicks www.everythingispermitted.com,
and seconds later is watching Fatima giving head to a camel.
Surely, we should be curious, if not concerned about what
kind of sexual inclinations Billie the adult will be bringing
to the bedroom or dungeon. Small wonder that our culture
is producing more and more dysfunctional males, and by extension,
dysfunctional societies.
If the writing
is on the wall -- not enough of it on prison walls -- we,
as a society, are in denial. Like a proliferating virus
gone viral, the Internet is an expanding lawless universe
that has been subverted by its own insatiable, self-perpetuating
appetites, while the erstwhile link between freedom and
responsibility, the bedrock of every civilization, has been
co-opted by the one-size-fits-all Internet link. God is
dead and we’re dying right along with him to the effect
that our way of life is producing more and more perverts
who don’t care about anything, especially themselves,
and of course the children they hi-jack, abuse and sometimes
murder.
With the 21st
century unwell on its way, man’s once set-in-stone,
precious androcentric view of the world is crumbling all
around him, and the gender war casualities, the new nihilists
on the block, can no longer be ignored. The pressure on
men to be men has never been so onerous and uncompromising,
resulting in more male suicides and deviant sexuality, of
which pedophilia is but one symptom of an emerging social
pathology painted in black. If this trend is to be reversed,
if men are to find their way out of this ever widening gyre
of a black hole, it must begin with the young, which makes
it both a pedagogical and deontological challenge.
Education should
have as its first priority the goal of turning impressionable
young boys into healthy and wholesome adult men, naturally
accepting of the growing number of keen and confident women
in their midst. Only when men come to accept that women
hold up half the sky will there be fewer disabled men on
the loose, and by extension fewer pedophiles and damaged
children, most of whom will become damaged and delinquent
adults.
Not unrelated
to this colossal challenge is the obscenely easy access
to Internet porn and its effects on the young in shaping
their views of women and sexuality. Since the "for
18-years-and-older" restriction has zero purchase on
the Internet, censorship is a surely question whose time
has come.
Best said by
André Malraux: “A man becomes truly Man only
when in quest of what is most exalted in him.”