david solway's
GLOBAL WARNING: THE TRIALS OF AN UNSETTLED
SCIENCE
reviewed by
BRUCE BAWYER
__________________________________________
Bruce Bawer is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at
the Freedom Center and the author of While Europe Slept
and Surrender. His book The
Victims' Revolution: The Rise of Identity Studies and the Closing
of the Liberal Mind will be published late this
year by Broadside/Harper Collins. He is a regular contributer
at frontpagemag.com
where this review originally appeared.
For
those of us who might have thought (hoped?) that the climate-change
hysteria of a couple of years ago was already on its way into
the dustbin of history, the New York Times ran a piece
on August 11 insisting that the danger is more urgent than ever.
“Until recently,” wrote Northern Arizona University
earth scientist Chirstopher R. Schwalm, Clark University geographer
Christopher A. Williams, and Kevin Schaeffer of the National
Snow and Ice Data Center, “many scientists spoke of climate
change mainly as a ‘threat,’ sometime in the future.
But it is increasingly clear that we already live in the era
of human-induced climate change, with a growing frequency of
weather and climate extremes like heat waves, droughts, floods
and fires.” In the Times piece, which is apparently
a précis of a recent essay in the journal Nature-Geoscience,
the three authors argued that the recent drought in the American
West, in its length and severity, represented a radical departure
from previous droughts, and that climate models suggest that
“this extreme event could become the new normal.”
Their prescription: to prevent “a multidecade megadrought,”
we must “reduce fossil-fuel emissions.” And their
conclusion: “there can be little doubt that what was once
thought to be a future threat is suddenly, catastrophically
upon us.”
Yeah,
whatever. I might be more inclined to take this sort of thing
seriously if I hadn’t paid attention to Climategate and
spent several days in December 2009 at the Copenhagen Climate
Conference, which took place shortly after that scandal. Never
have I seen a supposedly scientific event that was so thoroughly
disconnected from science and suffused with politics –
and so easily confused with religion. Climategate, it will be
recalled, exposed the fact that global-warming boosters in the
scientific community had been engaged in efforts, as a Wall
Street Journal editorial put it, “to fit the data
to their conclusions while attempting to silence and discredit
their critics.” As I wrote at the time, it was no surprise
that Climategate didn’t spell a quick end to the climate-change
scam, for the scam wasn’t really about science at all
but about politics – about having an excuse to target
capitalist countries (above all the U.S.), which, as the dogma
told us, was desecrating the environment and destroying the
ozone layer.
Icy
Copenhagen in December, alas, was hardly the best place to try
to sell the message that we’re all in danger of tanning
to death. (From where I sit now in Norway, toward the end of
a cool, rainy summer, the idea of global warming is equally
unpersuasive.) In any event, the always outsized hypocrisy of
the top-flight climate-change sermonizers, with their own Sasquatch-sized
carbon footprints, is enough to dispel any tendency to believe
a word they say: the day Al Gore or the head of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change or Larry David’s shrill, annoying,
self-righteous ex-wife starts practicing what he or she preaches
is the day I might start taking their pious rhetoric seriously.
As
Sunday’s Times article makes clear, the Climate
Mafia isn’t yet prepared to go away. So the arrival of
David Solway’s brief but brilliant new book, Global
Warning: The Trials of an Unsettled Science, is both timely
and exceedingly welcome.
This
is a no-nonsense text – a masterpiece of concision, yet
one that is comprehensive in its coverage, meticulous in its
documentation, penetrating in its insights, and (to boot) an
elegant and droll chunk of prose. Solway cites a raft of experts
who have cast doubts – convincingly – on the alleged
certitudes and methodologies of those he labels the “Warmists.”
He argues that the rise of Warmism is a consequence of the withdrawal
of what Matthew Arnold called the Sea of Faith: “A bizarre
inversion has occurred,” Solway proposes, “in which
the Earth itself, a Divinity called Gaia, has arisen to sit
upon the empty throne of Heaven” – the all-important
difference being that whereas true religion seeks “the
enhancement of human life,” Warmism “envisages the
impoverishment and even the destruction of human life.”
Solway quotes a series of chilling statements by respected environmentalists
who claim to believe the extinction of humanity would be a dandy
way of saving the planet. He observes that the Warming faithful
seem, paradoxically, to aspire both to some kind of angel-like
existence beyond the physical and to the raw physicality of
prehistoric primates. He quotes several contemporary poets who
have poured out reams of banal, insipid, anti-humanistic balderdash
in which they credit nature and the body with a “wisdom”
denied to man. He provides ample evidence that leading Warmists,
from Gore on down, have – surprise! – made a pretty
penny off of the climate-change racket. He underscores the fact
that many people have become adherents of Warmism mainly because
they want an excuse to agitate for the transference of wealth
from developed to developing countries. And he reminds us that
only a few decades ago all the bien pensant folks were
getting worked up about global cooling: “in 1975 the New
York Times brooded that the earth ‘may be headed
for another ice age,’ in the March 1975 issue of Science,
we were informed that ‘the approach of a full-blown 10,000-year
ice age [was] a real possibility.”
The
bottom line, Solway recognizes, is that Warmism is yet another
statist, collectivist, technocratic attempt to “regulate
our lives down to the tiniest details” – and for
that reason must be viewed with the utmost seriousness, even
if the whole thing is thoroughly deserving of ridicule. Solway
tells of a British power company that – shades of Stalin!
– actually encourages kids to “inform…on their
parents who might be committing ‘climate crimes.’”
He quotes Czech president Vaclav Klaus: “As someone who
lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to
say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the
market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism.”
In a similar vein, British biogeographer Philip Stott warns
that Warmism has “replac[ed] Marxism as a dominant force
for controlling liberty and human choices,” and French
philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy speaks of “Reds
who have now turned Greens…of the revolutionary jihad
variety.” Then there’s Jonah Goldberg’s observation,
in Liberal Fascism, that “environmentalism gives
license to the sort of moral bullying and intrusion that, were
it couched in terms of traditional morality, liberals would
immediately denounce as fascist.”
As
Solway sums it up, climate change is the religion of choice
for “a fervid congregation of believers, do-gooders, talking
heads, leftist apparatchiks, academic elites, cynical exploiters,
eco-fascists, petty despots and saints-in-the-making, all chanting
together the glossolalia of climate warming.” And if media
like the Times don’t acknowledge this, it’s
either because they don’t get it, or because they’ve
gone too far at this point to reject “their years of advocacy”
and face the truth. That’s a bare-bones summary of Solway’s
case; what I can’t capture here is the eloquence and wit
with which he makes it. What I can say about his book, in closing,
is this: everything you need to know the next time you’re
confronted with some cocksure, brainwashed acolyte of the Warmist
faith and want to shut him (her?) up decisively can be found
in its pages.