all along the western front
ISLAM, HIP-HOP AND LIBERATION
by
STEVEN FINK
______________________________________
Steven
Fink is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Philosophy
and Religious Studies at the
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. He writes for the Journal
of Religion & Society.
Seeking
to provide deeper insight into Black experience in America,
W. E. B. Du Bois wrote The Souls of Black Folk in 1903,
a time of legalized racial segregation. According to Du Bois,
life as an African American involved existential confusion,
since an African American was born into
“a
world which yields him no true self-consciousness, but only
lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world.
It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this
sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes
of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world
that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his
two-ness, – an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts,
two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body.”
Du
Bois presented this double consciousness as a burden for Blacks,
as their identities were torn asunder and dictated to them by
Whites who misunderstood them. Furthermore, this burden was
compounded with dehumanizing prejudice and practices that demoralized
Blacks. Du Bois identifies “personal disrespect and mockery,
the ridicule and systematic humiliation, the distortion of fact
and wanton license of fancy” that African Americans encountered
regularly from Whites in their midst.
Moving
one century later, strong connections can be made between early
twentieth century Black experience and that of contemporary
Muslim Americans, especially since the events of September 11,
2001. Statistically, negative effects upon Muslim Americans
following 9/11 are easily observable. The Council for American
Islamic Relations received over 1,700 complaints of hate crimes
and harassment during the two months after September 11, and
the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Hate Crimes Unit
recorded a rise in attacks on Muslims, from 28 in 2000 to 481
in 2001. According to a USA Today/Gallup Poll five
years afterwards, 39 percent of Americans acknowledged personal
prejudice against Muslims and believed that all Muslims, even
American citizens, should carry special identification. Moreover,
under the provisions of the new USA Patriot Act, 1,182 Muslims
and Arabs were arrested by November 5, 2001, according to figures
released by the U.S. Justice Department.
Beyond
these statistics, many Muslims in post-September 11 America
have dealt with internal struggles which hearken back to Du
Bois’s description of African Americans in the early twentieth
century. Reflecting Du Bois’s claim that upon viewing
Blacks, Whites commonly thought to themselves, “How does
it feel to be a problem?” Moustafa Bayoumi writes that
Arabs and Muslim Americans are viewed as “the new ‘problem’
of American society.” Certainly parallels between Du Boisian
analysis and contemporary Muslim experience must not be taken
too far. It is the desire neither of Bayoumi nor myself to promote
the idea that Muslim Americans are inevitably torn apart by
a feeling of “twoness” as Muslims and Americans,
since this generalization certainly does not apply to all Muslim
Americans, and it could easily be tied to an “Islam vs.
the West” bifurcation that many Muslim Americans and scholars
of American Islam have worked so hard to debunk. However, I
recognize that a significant connection may exist between the
experience of twenty-first century Muslim Americans and Du Bois’s
conception of Blacks viewing themselves through the eyes of
Whites. Contemporary Muslim Americans may view themselves in
accordance with negative stereotypes promoted by non-Muslim
Americans, such as the belief that Muslims are dangerous threats
to American society.
While
the extent to which this occurs is debatable, it is significant
that some Muslims in the United States have manifested deep
concern about Muslim Americans viewing themselves through the
eyes of non-Muslims and, as a result, experiencing discouragement
and failing to persevere in Islamic faith. Among these concerned
Muslims are American Islamic hip hop artists, many of whom present
Muslim Americans as embattled by negative stereotypes. For these
artists, Muslim Americans must define themselves not in accordance
with these stereotypes but rather in a manner shaped by Islamic
principles. The viewpoint of these artists reflects the anthropological
insights of Paul Ricoeur, who argues that humans are free, possessing
agency for self-definition, but also finite, as self-definition
never occurs by an isolated self but by a self influenced by
received linguistic material. According to Ricoeur, a self is
simultaneously active and passive, projecting oneself towards
possible ways of being in the world, but only through its interaction
with linguistic material. American Islamic hip hop artists are
concerned that Muslim American self-definition is commonly shaped
by linguistic material provided by non-Muslim Americans; they
desire instead that Muslim American self-definition be molded
by linguistic material rooted in Islamic tradition, so that
these Muslims do not succumb to discouragement, no longer persevering
in Islamic belief and practice.
To
further conceptualize what these hip hop artists seek to accomplish,
I turn to a central theme in Islamic tradition, asserting that
they remind listeners of linguistic material grounded in Islamic
discourse. The Arabic DH-K-R root, meaning “to remember”
or “to remind,” has played a key role in various
articulations of Islamic belief and practice. The Qur’an
uses this root to present prophets and itself as reminders and
to call believers to help fellow Muslims remember core Islamic
ideas, since humans are prone to forgetfulness, in part because
Satan seeks to pull believers away from the straight path revealed
by God. For American Islamic hip hop artists, amidst definitions
of Muslim existence offered by non-Muslims in post-September
11 America, Muslims may be especially prone to forget who they
are according to Islamic discourse, and so constant reminder
is needed. One common reminder offered by these artists involves
the Qur’anic principle that Muslims are the best of all
peoples. Following a brief discussion of background information
about American Islamic hip hop, I will explore lyrics to uncover
ways in which this Qur’anic principle is communicated.
Lyrical analysis alone, however, is insufficient, since unlike
other forms of Islamic discourse such as sermons or written
literature, hip hop must be accounted for as a form of music.
Therefore, musicological analysis will follow the lyrical analysis.
Together these will reveal a shared temporal structure both
lyrically and musically, which strengthens the lyrical reminder
to listeners that they are the best of all peoples.
AMERICAN
ISLAMIC HIP-HOP: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Hip-hop
originated in New York’s South Bronx in the 1970s, a setting
marked by industrial decline and social turmoil. While the term
hip-hop can refer to a multifaceted cultural response to this
setting, including not only a genre of music but also a style
of dress, a unique vocabulary, graffiti art, and break dancing,
hip-hop in this article refers only to the musical genre, also
known as rap. Almost from its beginnings, this form of music
was
connected to the Islamic tradition due to its associations with
the Nation of Islam and the Nation of Gods and Earths (or the
Five Percent Nation). Numerous hip hop artists, including the
widely popular Public Enemy, have been adherents of the Nation
of Islam and have featured Nation of Islam themes in their songs,
for example calling for Black separation rather than integration
or honoring Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Similarly,
many hip-hop artists such as Big Daddy Kane, Brand Nubian, and
the Wu-Tang Clan have been part of the Nation of Gods and Earths,
and phrases originating from Five Percent Nation theology, including
“droppin’ science,” “sup G,” and
“let me break it down for ya,” have become commonplace
in hip hop terminology. Many Muslim Americans, however, place
both the Nation of Islam and Nation of Gods and Earths outside
the pale of Islamic orthodoxy, due among other reasons to the
Nation of Islam teaching that God appeared on earth in the 1930s
in the human form of Wallace Fard and to the of Gods and Earths
belief that Black men collectively are God. While members of
these groups have significantly shaped the hip-hop world, my
focus instead will be on Islamic hip-hop artists who have followed
neither movement and therefore may be classified as followers
of “mainstream Islam.” I will narrow my focus further,
considering that whereas some hip hop artists within mainstream
Islam are known for secular pursuits in which Islamic belief
and practice play little or no role in their songs’ lyrics,
others have made their Islamic faith central. I will concentrate
on the latter, and in doing so I adopt the following terminological
distinction from Suad Abdul Khabeer:
I
use the term Islamic rather than Muslim to distinguish a genre
of hip-hop music and culture created by American Muslims that
seeks to comply with Islamic religious standards and practices
whose current and primary audience is Muslims. For example,
Islamic hip hop may restrict the types of musical instruments
used, generally does not employ expletives and frequently refers
to issues of doctrinal import. Differentiated in this manner,
songs I will analyze come from American Islamic instead of American
Muslim hip hop artists.
Brief
profiles of American Islamic hip-hop artists whose lyrics will
be considered in this article can illuminate ways in which they
desire to make Islamic faith central in their musical pursuits.
Native Deen (the Arabic deen can be translated as “religion”)
comprises three African Americans from the Washington D.C. area
who aim to call listeners “to keep the faith, to live
better lives, and to NOT succumb to the pressures and temptations
of modern society” (MuslimHipHop.com). The best known
of all American Islamic hip hop artists, Native Deen has performed
their message of following Islam in all circumstances in over
60 cities in four continents. 3ILM (ILM stands for “Islamically
Liberated Minds” but also refers to the Arabic ilm,
meaning “knowledge”) is made up of five Arab Americans
from the Tampa Bay area who claim to be “dedicated to
unifying Muslim Minds for the sake of Allah, one song at a time”
(MuslimHipHop.com). 3ILM donates 25 percent of their record
profits to Islamic schools in the Tampa Bay area, similar to
the commitment of MPAC (Muslim Produced Athletic Company) to
assist Islamic schools in Chicago. MPAC includes four Arab Americans
and two African Americans from Chicago, and their profile on
MuslimHipHop.com highlights their religious observance as well
as their belief that hip-hop speaks powerfully to contemporary
Muslim Americans, declaring that their music represents “a
transition in history from conventional conservative means of
expression to more powerful identity-forming methods of self-awareness.”
Importantly, many American Islamic hip hop artists aspire not
only to promote Islamic teaching but also to create high-quality
hip-hop music. New York-based Jabbar & Ali, for example,
identify their “vision of making authentic and original
music that sets them apart from the redundant artists and sounds
so prevalent in Hip Hop today . . . Our intention is to bring
back the days of hip hop, we’re coming with 360 degrees
of rap, expect the unexpected” (MuslimHipHop.com). Furthermore,
the Minneapolis duo The Faculty highlights another goal of many
American Islamic hip hop artists, with their desire to identify
and criticize examples of social injustice. MuslimHipHop.com
identifies The Faculty as “a politically, socially, and
morally conscious hip hop group” with “penetrating
lyrics” that commonly expose wrongdoings committed against
Muslims as well as by Muslims who engage in acts of violence.
One
particularly significant goal of many American Islamic hip hop
artists involves building a more unified American Islam, especially
one that transcends what in some cases has been a powerful divide
between immigrant Muslims and African American Muslims. This
divide results from multiple factors, chiefly the commonly stated
African American Muslim concern that immigrants look down upon
them as lacking authority in regard to Islamic belief and practice.
Abdul Khabeer writes that African American Islamic hip hop artists
perform “against the dominant narrative of the immigrant
Muslim,” as they see “themselves as already American
and demand that their experience is acknowledged in the discourse
on Islam in America.” Rather than foregrounding their
racial identity, however, some African American artists such
as Native Deen emphasize that they belong to the ummah,
the worldwide community of believers. Moreover, some prominent
American Islamic hip hop groups are racially or ethnically diverse,
such as the aforementioned MPAC as well as the Sons of Hagar,
made up of two Arab Americans, one Irish American, and a Korean
American. As Geneive Abdo comments about the Sons of Hagar,
such groups manifest a cooperative effort among multiethnic
Muslim Americans “to place their Muslim identity first”
in order to construct a stronger, more cohesive American Islam.
According
to Abdul Khabeer, American Islamic hip-hop artists “promote
discourse and representations of whom they believe Muslims are,
as well as who they should and can be.” While these artists
appeal to Muslim audiences with their discourse and representations,
they aim to reach non-Muslim listeners as well. The concept
of da‘wa, or spreading the Islamic message, holds
great importance to many Islamic hip-hop artists, in part due
to a desire to attract non-Muslims to Islamic faith but also
in order to change non-Muslims’ views of Islam and Muslims.
Abdul Khabeer writes that “artists believe that through
the proliferation and popularity of Islamically-themed hip-hop,
non-Muslims will begin to learn that Muslims are not the dangerous
other; rather, that Muslims are people who share many of the
same aspirations and fears as non-Muslims, particularly other
Americans.” These artists battle negative stereotypes
of Muslims in America not only to change the consciousness of
Muslims in America but also of non-Muslims.
LYRICAL
ANALYSIS OF AMERICAN ISLAMIC HIP-HOP
Seeking
to remind listeners of key Islamic principles so that their
self-definition is not shaped by stereotypes advanced by non-Muslim
Americans, American Islamic hip hop artists want listeners to
persevere in their faith amidst difficult circumstances, an
idea that appears in numerous Qur’anic verses such as
2:153 (“O you who believe, seek courage in fortitude and
prayer, for God is with those who are patient and persevere”;
all Qur’anic translations from Ahmed Ali). This theme
of perseverance is heard in many post 9/11 American Islamic
hip-hop songs, including those that decry crackdowns on Muslim
civil liberties. Naeem Mohaiemen notes that whereas in the 1980s
and 1990s Public Enemy responded to police brutality by rapping
about “Driving While Black,” Islamic hip-hop artists
have recently highlighted the difficulty of “Flying While
Brown.” Similarly, they have protested against, and called
listeners to persevere amidst, government detention of law-abiding
Muslim Americans. For example, in “Still Strong,”
Native Deen tells a story of an innocent Muslim taken from his
home by government agents. The protagonist declares:
And
they was asking me that and asking me this
Accusing me of being on somebody’s terrorist list
I had to resist, I want a lawyer’s all I would say
But they said that they would torture me all night and all day
. . .
Osama Bin who, they want to say I support him
If I don’t give in, I’ll never see my family again
It’s been more than 10 months since they dragged me from
home
4 hours questioning and 20 in my cell alone
The
shifting from first-person singular to describe the plight of
the protagonist to first-person plural to speak for Muslim Americans
in general, Native Deen proclaims in the refrain, “We’re
not breaking, we’re still strong, no matter what they
do we’re moving on.”
MUSLIMS
AS THREATS TO AMERICAN SOCIETY
Accounting
for the prevalence of the view that Muslims threaten American
society, hip-hop artists often blame the American media due
to its predilection for sensationalism and its tendency to advance
stereotypes about Muslims. While some members of the American
media have portrayed Muslims negatively for many decades, this
has especially been the case
since 9/11, and Islamic hip-hop artists see a need to speak
against such media activity. According to these artists, the
media promulgates the view that Muslims as a whole are prone
to engage in violent actions against innocent Americans and
that they want to transform America into an Islamic state. One
goal of American Islamic hip-hop artists is to present non-Muslim
listeners with a version of Islam that sharply counteracts what
is commonly presented by the American media. Recognizing that
the great majority of their audience comprises Muslim listeners,
however, the more pressing goal of these artists is to help
Muslims shape their self-definition through the principle that
they are the best of all peoples instead of the view that they
are unwanted threats to American society.
Native
Deen proclaims:
Don’t
ever frown, or your head looking down,
If you read the Qur’an you’re the best in the town.
Y’all have doubt say – we have no clout
But within a few years see how we’ve come about.
We’re back on the scene, the number-one deen,
I’m proud to be down with the Muslimeen [Muslims]!
While
my primary purpose in analyzing these songs’ lyrics is to
highlight their implicit argument that by defining themselves
as the best of all peoples, Muslim listeners can persevere in
Islamic faith, it should at least be acknowledged that potentially
deleterious results could emerge due to promoting this argument.
In particular, negative consequences may arise from countering
the superiority over Muslims assumed by many non-Muslims in the
United States with a view that emphasizes the superiority of Muslims
over non-Muslims. The subject position constructed in these songs
may promote a separatist mindset that strongly challenges the
desires of Muslim Americans who seek to avoid such an isolationist
approach. Many Muslim Americans have made a conscious effort to
integrate within the surrounding American society, reflecting
the declaration from Feisal Abdul Rauf, a leader of a prominent
mosque in New York, that the “crucial need of our day is
to find ways to accelerate the process whereby American Muslims
will be able to establish their Islamic identity not apart from
or in spite of their American identity, but precisely in and through
it.” Many Muslim Americans with this mindset believe that
faithfulness to God requires that they attempt to make a positive
impact upon American society, which cannot be done through an
isolated existence; rather they must engage with American society
for the sake of its reformation while maintaining their core Islamic
beliefs and practices. Advocates of such selective engagement
constitute one subgroup of Muslim Americans, one whose vision
of Muslim existence in the United States differs greatly from
that of Muslim Americans who endorse isolation. Insofar as American
Islamic hip hop artists may contribute to an isolationist mindset,
the aforementioned goal of many hip hop artists to build a more
unified Islam may be undermined by strengthening the convictions
of one subgroup of Muslim Americans over against another.
NEGATIVE VIEWS OF MUSLIM WOMEN
While
the hip-hop artists under consideration may believe that the American
media plays a role in the prevalence of negative stereotypes of
Muslim women, they do not emphasize the media in these songs;
rather attention falls directly on non-Muslim Americans in general
and the way in which they view Muslim women. More specifically,
these songs deal with negative views of Muslim women based on
their manner of dress, which causes non-Muslims to make numerous
claims about Muslim women such as their not being beautiful or
not being able to think for themselves. In response to these understandings,
artists present an alternative view featuring the principle of
Muslims as the best of all peoples, or in this case the best of
all women. These songs argue that amidst discriminatory, misinformed
definitions of their existence, Muslim women can persevere in
Islamic faith by remembering that they stand above non-Muslim
women in America, especially because of their true beauty that
transcends external appearance and because of their strong sense
of purpose which results from their God-given role in advancing
Islam in America. Hip hop-artists want Muslim American women to
define themselves as superior to non-Muslim women, who according
to these artists are often mesmerized by a concept of beauty defined
by external image rather than internal character and who frequently
fail to find a meaningful sense of purpose in life. Importantly,
though, this superiority is to shape Muslim women’s self-definition
not for the sake of arrogance but instead for the purpose of perseverance
in Islamic faith.
3ILM
addresses negative reactions that Muslim women receive due to
their manner of dress in the song “Queen of the Land.”
All
some people wanna do is look, glare, and stare at you
Rude and not fair how dare they be telling you
To confess that you’re oppressed and you’re uneducated
Cuz they say the way you’re dressed makes you unliberated
. . .
Still they think that you’re forced and you got no voice
They think you dressing in hijab [head covering] ain’t
your choice.
3ILM
ultimately emphasizes the idea that internal character outweighs
external appearance.
You
are the future mothers of the future generation
Hold the ax to break the barriers that Muslims keep facin
So sister sister you’re the queen of the land
Contrary
to women who are focused on external beauty at the expense of
cultivating strong, beautiful inner character and who lack a meaningful
purpose in life such as representing and continuing Islam in America,
Muslim women are to view themselves as the best of all women in
America.
Jabbar
& Ali present a similar argument in “1-800-Muslims.”
Next
time a chick asks why you wearing a sheet?
You reply in her face why you gotta look cheap?
Why you lookin all swollen like you got a disease?
For Jabbar
& Ali, Muslim women are superior tonon-Muslim women, many
of whom are sexually promiscuous and obsessed with external appearance,
lacking any deep, meaningful sense of purpose.
Having
highlighted the implicit argument within these songs focusing
on Muslim women, once again it should at least be acknowledged
that potentially deleterious results could arise from the way
in which American Islamic hip-hop artists portray Muslim women
as the best of all women. By presenting the best of all women
as those who are steadfastly committed to covering their heads
in public, 3ILM, MPAC, Jabbar & Ali, and Native Deen construct
a normative vision of Muslim female piety that does not reflect
the diversity of Muslim American women. These artists seem to
suggest that a Muslim woman should be thought of as pious only
when wearing hijab, which goes against the view of those Muslim
American women who do not consider hijab to be a religious obligation.
Many such women agree with a claim expressed by Amina Wadud, a
leading advocate for women’s rights in Islam, who writes
that “in Arabia at the time of the revelation, women of
wealthy and powerful tribes were veiled and secluded as an indication
of protection. The Qur’an acknowledges the virtue of modesty
and demonstrates it through the prevailing practices. The principle
of modesty is important – not the veiling and seclusion
which were
manifestations particular to that context.” Women with this
mindset are excluded from a conception of Muslim female piety
that involves obligatory wearing of hijab, and so again, insofar
as American Islamic hip hop artists may contribute to this conception,
their stated goal of building a more unified Islam may be undermined
by strengthening the convictions of one subgroup of Muslim Americans,
that which views hijab as a religious requirement, over against
another that does not share this view.
Furthermore,
attention should be given to the fact that every hip hop artist
considered above is male. Thus it is Muslim men who are telling
Muslim females how to conduct their lives as “the best of
all women.” These male hip hop artists intend to replace
a definition of Muslim women’s lives offered by others (non-Muslim
Americans) with a definition again provided by others (Muslim
men). Notably, this will most likely continue to be a dominant
trend in American Islamic hip hop until a significant number of
Muslim women enter the hip hop world. Anaya McMurray identifies
a hindrance to Muslim women following such a path, stating that
“Muslim women are often expected to fit into stereotypical
‘good girl’ roles by Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
These expectations encourage them to be tied to the home, submissive,
and veiled, conditions that are not reconcilable with a career
in the rap music industry.” It appears, however, that little
by little Muslim American women are becoming hip-hop artists.
MuslimHipHop.com
provides profiles and musical samples of three Muslim American
female hip hop artists, Miss Undastood, Ms. Latifah, and Sister
Haera. Of these three, Miss Undastood, an African American who
grew up in inner-city New York, enjoys the widest audience. While
Miss Undastood expresses a personal commitment to wearing hijab,
both in terms of how she appears in performances as well as through
song lyrics, she emphasizes that Muslim women who do not share
this commitment should not be disparaged. For example, in “Hijab
is the One Thing,” she sings,
Just
because I cover don’t mean I’m more righteous.
Just because she doesn’t, don’t mean she’s
less pious.
Miss
Undastood is adamant that Muslim women must possess the right
to determine their own understanding of Muslim piety rather than
allow Muslim men to dictate conformity to a vision of “the
ideal Muslim woman,” a construction which typically emphasizes
submission to one’s husband and other Muslim men.
MUSICOLOGICAL
ANALYSIS OF HIP-HOP - THE TEMPORAL STRUCTURE OF REMINDING
Human
experience of time defies simplistic conceptualization. Whereas
in the modern Western mindset, with its dependence on precise
measurement of duration through calendars, mechanical clocks,
and other means, time is commonly viewed solely in a sequential,
linear manner, anthropologists have uncovered alternative, non-linear
conceptions of time in various cultures throughout the world,
and philosophers have made distinctions between linear and non-linear.
One such
philosopher, John Ellis McTaggart, differentiated the static,
linear “earlier-simultaneous-later” from the dynamic,
non-linear “past-presentfuture.” In the former, events
never change, since if one event is earlier than another it will
always remain earlier. In the latter, on the other hand, time
is constantly in flux, with events moving fluidly between being
anticipated as future, perceived as present, and remembered as
past; for example, every event once anticipated as future will
eventually be remembered as past. Despite this difference in conceptualization,
however, these two temporal structures need not be mutually exclusive.
Such
dual temporality characterizes the experience of a Muslim American
who listens to the lyrics of hip-hop songs discussed above. On
one level, linear temporal experience shapes one’s relation
to these lyrics, which address non-Muslims’ views of Muslim
existence that have arisen especially because of the recent sequential
course of events such as 9/11. On another level, non-linear temporal
experience plays a deeply influential role, as listeners are told
they are the best of all peoples, a principle which for Muslims
transcends any particular moment in linear temporal experience.
It should
be acknowledged that hip-hop is not the only musical genre that
involves more than one type of temporal experience. Any form of
music, as a means of expression which progresses through successive
moments, manifests a linear, sequential temporality; additionally,
though, various types of music demonstrate alternative temporal
experiences. Thomas Clifton writes, “There is a distinction
between the time which a piece takes and the time which a piece
presents or evokes,” as music conveys a sense of duration
and temporal relation which often differs from linear temporal
experience. Importantly, the same piece of music can promote multiple
temporal experiences simultaneously, made possible according to
Jonathan Kramer because “time does not obey the law of contradiction:
it can be many different things at once. All music is heard at
first as a moment-to-moment succession, although it also creates
the very different continua of musical time.” In some musical
works, these different continua are manufactured and manipulated
by musical composers, as occurs for example in what Kramer calls
a “false ending,” which sounds like a typical ending
without actually functioning in that manner.
Cheryl
Keyes writes that “the Western concept of linear time is
not sufficient in the analysis of African-derived music;”
fundamentally this is the case because of this music’s heavy
reliance upon repetition. Indeed all music contains repetition
in some form, yet a distinction should be made between two forms
of repetition, corresponding to the aforementioned distinction
between Western tonal music and African derived music. Christopher
Small writes, “The repetitions of African music have a function
in time which is the reverse of (Western classical) music –
to dissolve the past and future into one eternal present, in which
the passing of time is no longer noticed.” Whereas repetition
in Western tonal music highlights linear, teleological progression,
repetition in African-derived music transcends such sequential
temporal experience. According to James Snead, this type of repetition
is prominent in Black cultures, which perceive repetition as a
means of circulation and equilibrium rather than accumulation
and growth towards a final goal, as is the norm in European cultures.
Snead states that in Black cultures “the thing (the ritual,
the dance, the beat) is there for you to pick up when you come
back to get it.
Rose
notes that hip-hop artists ground their songs in loops of sounds
featuring musematic repetition, but within these loops they “build
in critical moments, where the established rhythm is manipulated
and suspended.” This manipulation and suspension of repetitive
equilibrium occurs through hip hop devices such as scratching,
in which artists produce sounds by moving a record back and forth
on a turntable. Rupturing repetitive equilibrium, scratching makes
listeners aware of linear temporal flow. Similarly, musematic
repetition is disrupted through sampling. Used more frequently
than scratching in American Islamic hip-hop, sampling refers to
the utilization of digital technology that can duplicate sounds
and play them in any order and in any key or pitch. Samplers contain
a seemingly endless number of digital sounds, including recently
released songs as well as songs from many years ago.
Sampling
and other forms of musical rupture play a major role in hip-hop
music; ultimately, however, it is musematic repetition that undergirds
this music, serving as the backbone of any hip-hop song.
Rose
illustrates this point by discussing “break beats,”
in which hip-hop artists sample a break, which is a segment of
a hip hop song where all elements except for percussion disappear.
She argues that while break beats are important in hip-hop songs,
“the ‘break beat’ itself is looped – repositioned
as repetition, as equilibrium inside the rupture. Rap music highlights
points of rupture as it equalizes them.” Using a term employed
by Snead, break beats are a type of “cut,” or a point
at which artists depart from the repetitive musical flow but can
pick up where they left off. According to Snead, “the ‘cut’
overtly insists on the repetitive nature of the music.”
The disruptive cut, in the form of scratching, break beats, or
other types of sampling, contributes to hip hop music’s
powerful effects upon listeners, but effects produced by musical
disruption are ultimately relativized by effects caused by the
backbone of hip hop music, musematic repetition. Within the consciousness
of a hip hop listener, there is awareness of linear temporal experience
because of musical disruption, but there is even deeper awareness
of dynamic, non-linear temporality because of musematic repetition.
Thus striking similarity exists between the temporal structure
of hip hop music and the temporal structure of reminding found
in lyrics of many American Islamic hip hop songs, as in each case
linear temporality is significant yet not nearly as significant
as dynamic, non-linear temporal experience. Due to this shared
temporal structure, the music of American Islamic hip hop strengthens
lyrical reminders that Muslims are the best of all peoples.
FURTHER
CONSIDERATIONS
One possible
consideration pertains to the fact that like poetry and other
forms of communication that feature a strong sense of rhythm and
rhyme, hip-hop is replete with mnemonic aids. Numerous scholars
have explored the connection between memory and sound similarity
and pattern, a link which may be at its strongest when rhythm
and rhyme work in tandem. Oliver Sacks declares, “Entire
books can be held in memory – The Iliad and The
Odyssey, famously, could be recited at length because, like
ballads, they had rhythm and rhyme.” Similar to these ancient
epics, hip-hop commonly features rhymes that are synchronized
with a metrical beat, thereby facilitating memory of the song’s
content.
This
consideration can be related to another, namely musical entrainment,
in which anatomical movements and other physiological or psychological
functions become synchronized with musical rhythms. Tia DeNora
explains this phenomenon by stating, “Perhaps the most straightforward
example of musical entrainment in relation to the body can be
found when music is used as a basis for marching in step or otherwise
synchronizing bodily movement, such as skipping rope. . . Musically
entrained, the body and its processes unfold in relation to musical
elements (in these examples, its regular pulse); they are aligned
and regularized in relation to music.” As Daniel Schneck
and Dorita Berger discuss, a large number of bodily rhythms may
become entrained with musical rhythm. They write, “Concurrent
with the rhythms of human propulsion and motor activities are
a complex array of compound rhythms simultaneously taking place
within our physiological systems. For example, there are the pulsations
of heartbeat; there are the myriad rhythmicities of neurons firing
in the brain.” Because of hip-hop’s heavy emphasis
on rhythm, a strong connection may exist between hip-hop music
and neurological functioning tied to memory functions.
And
finally, attention should be given to the fact that not all Muslim
Americans listen to hip-hop music. In some cases this is a matter
of personal musical preference, but notably for some Muslims,
this results from religious conviction. Muslim Americans have
different views regarding the acceptability of listening to hip-hop
music, in large part because of a long-standing disagreement among
Muslims over whether music, or certain forms of music, is halal
(permissible) or haram (impermissible). At one end of
the spectrum stand Muslims who, due to their understanding of
Islamic teachings, listen to no music, which they regard as a
distracting, deleterious influence upon their faith. Although
no Qur’anic verse explicitly forbids music, Muslims holding
this viewpoint often include music as part of the Qur’anic
concept of laghw, which connotes forbidden oral activities
such as gossip. At another point on the spectrum are Muslims who
accept music but only if it does not use musical instruments,
a conviction shaped by sayings attributed to the Prophet Muhammad
such as, “From among my followers there will be some people
who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk
(clothes), the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical
instruments, as lawful.” Importantly, though, Islamic scholars
debate the authenticity of such sayings, thereby contributing
to Muslim Americans’ diverse viewpoints regarding music.
As Abdul Khabeer points out, while many Muslim Americans take
a strong stance on the issue, many others are ambivalent. For
the latter, the “ends justify the means; uncertainty regarding
the permissibility of music is outweighed by the ways Islamic
hip hop is believed to benefit the Muslim community.”
In light
of this debate, it would be illuminating to build upon this article
by acquiring detailed demographic data regarding Muslim Americans’
opinions and convictions about Islamic hip-hop. Since this music
can function as a powerful reminder of Islamic principles, it
would be interesting to determine who indeed is listening to this
music and therefore may be benefitting from it in this way. While
certain assumptions, such as the idea that the majority of Muslim
youth in America view hip-hop as halal, may be verified, some
surprising discoveries may also materialize, thus providing a
fuller picture of American Islamic hip-hop’s effects upon
Muslim Americans.